Awhile back during one of the Tarot Blog Hops, I did a version of the Devil card for my Mad Uncle Morgan's Political Tarot. I wasn't completely happy with it; so last week, I re-did the background of the card. So now, the debate is whether version A (the first version) or Version B (the new background) looks better. What do you think--A or B?
Image B is easier to see. The contrast is better between the figures and the background. Card A would be better if you want it more difficult to look at. The dots are visually "busy" and make my eye move around a lot. It's like television static.
A cross between Douglas Adams, Robert Heinlein, Erma Bombeck, Sybil Leek, and Wednesday Addams, Morgan Drake Eckstein writes in multiple genres and under many pennames. A survivor of several secret societies, MDE has served as a pagan (Wicca) community church board member as well as a Golden Dawn Hierophant. Today, he is (along with his wife, Khari) a minister of Fireside Wicca Community Church in Denver, Colorado.
Among his pennames are Michael Ramalia (the New Egyptian Space Empire) . . .
3 comments:
B, def. The Devil looks a lot friendly there somehow, 'cos of the background :)
Image B is easier to see. The contrast is better between the figures and the background. Card A would be better if you want it more difficult to look at. The dots are visually "busy" and make my eye move around a lot. It's like television static.
I prefer B. You can see mire relevant detail.
Post a Comment