My wife seems to be performing science experiments using oatmeal. Or at least, that is how I am going to think about it for the next couple of minutes.
A few years ago, a friend of my wife taught her the trick of putting oatmeal in those travel coffee mugs (gee, thanks Th.). Which by itself is ok, provided that the oatmeal gets eaten and the mug brought in the house in a timely manner.
Unfortunately, my wife tends to be busy, so there is always that one cup of oatmeal that did not get eaten every week that sits in the car for days on end...until you can hold the mug upside down and oatmeal and spoon remain in the cup.
My theory is that this is a psychological science experiment going on and that I am the lab rat. After all, I get to clean up this mess. There has been a couple of occasions where I have put water in the mugs, came back a hour later, and witnessed obvious fermentation occuring. Oatmeal beer anyone?
Don't get me wrong---I love my wife. But I do not think that she should be performing experiments with oatmeal. If I am not allowed to have a physical alchemy lab, then she should not be allowed to perform experiments on her husband's tolerance threshold limits using breakfast foods.
And then there was today...for some reason, she thought it was a good idea to pour the oatmeal into her purse. (Ok, I know it was an accident...I hope...I haven't talked to her about it yet.) I think that we hit my threshold---I refuse to clean the oatmeal off the remaining checks and notebooks. She can get herself another lab rat or monkey.
As always, you can leave comments pointing out how heartless I am in the comment sections. But please, do not leave her any encouragement to continue this weird experiment...think of me, the poor lab monkey who has to clean this stuff up.
Monday, March 28, 2011
Friday, March 25, 2011
If initiates had a Bill of RIghts
Over on Flight of Hermes, Soror FSO is asking for ideas about what people think should be included in an Initiate's Bill of Rights. Personally, I have never considered what my rights as an initiate and an Adept should be (note that in my universe, initiates and Adepts are not the same thing).
Or at least, in the mindset of a Bill of Rights. Many of the rights I believe that I should have as an initiate and an Adept have made their way into the bylaws of Bast Temple. That is what happens when you are one of the more experienced group members when a new lodge forms---people look to you for ideas and they believe you (Bwahahaha!).
For instance, thanks to personal experiences and what I learned in Hathoor Temple, I believe that the members of a lodge (including the majority of the Outer Order) should have voting rights. We should be allowed to decide who rules over us. Please note that Inner Order officers are elected by Inner Order, and Outer Order officers by Outer Order (the two Orders have different purposes and therefore different needs). But note that Bast Temple bylaws allow the removal of an officer if three quarters of the voting members of both Orders have serious doubts that they are doing their job properly.
I also believe that initiates should have the right to choose if they accept the ideas and commands of those people who claim contact with the Secret Chiefs, Third Order, or whatever it is being called this week. Maybe some of us do not want to obey a Third Order that had no hand in the development of Golden Dawn for a hundred years or so. The Golden Dawn (by whatever name) was left on its own for a long time; it is a little late to come in and claim rulership---especially if all we are going to get is a series of bizzare orders and regulations.
I believe that initiates should have the right to choose their own religion, and not be forced to give it up and convert to something else. I am Egyptian Wiccan with Viking tendencies, and maybe a kiss from the Hindu monkey god. Live with it. I am not going to make a good Thelemic, Catholic, Christian, or whatever. Work with my religion---it has ethics and beliefs.
I believe that all members including the Chief should pay their fair share unless they file for a stay of dues. I pay dues that are equal to the rest of the membership.
I believe that initiates deserve a straight answer about the sources of their lessons. I will admit that this is one of those strange areas where I believe that an initiate deserves a straight answer, and outsiders get only general indiciations of where to go. It is part of the benefit of belonging to a group---if you want a straight answer, join an Order.
I believe that the Inner Order officer's rights should probably be limited to issues of curriclum and advancement and the ability to hit the brake if they see their group about to do something really stupid (if it was a train wreck the last time someone tried the idea, it is probably going to be a train wreck this time around also). And note that they are elected and can be removed from office, so they better be doing things for the correct reasons (personal power is not a correct reason to do anything).
I believe that an initiate has the right to know the bylaws of their lodge and Order. And know how changes are made in the rules and regulations. No one should have to put up with an officer that can change the rules or suspend the bylaws with a wave of their hand.
I believe that an initiate should know the reason that their lodge and Order exists. There is a difference between Orders that issue merit badges for time served, and those who are pooling resources for magical purposes. The reason for a lodge's existence affects a lot of things, including what is needed to advance though the Grades.
And finally, I believe that initiates have rights to have human leaders. A leader should be able to come to the members of their group and ask for advice and suggestions. A leader should not have to be all-knowing and all-wise. It cuts down on a lot of BS if you are allowed to be a flawed human being, both as a member and as an officer.
As for these types of ideas making their way into an Initiate's Bill of Rights, I won't hold my breath. I have been told repeatly that my ideas are poppycock---and perhaps they are. But they are mine, and they are what I fight for.
Or at least, in the mindset of a Bill of Rights. Many of the rights I believe that I should have as an initiate and an Adept have made their way into the bylaws of Bast Temple. That is what happens when you are one of the more experienced group members when a new lodge forms---people look to you for ideas and they believe you (Bwahahaha!).
For instance, thanks to personal experiences and what I learned in Hathoor Temple, I believe that the members of a lodge (including the majority of the Outer Order) should have voting rights. We should be allowed to decide who rules over us. Please note that Inner Order officers are elected by Inner Order, and Outer Order officers by Outer Order (the two Orders have different purposes and therefore different needs). But note that Bast Temple bylaws allow the removal of an officer if three quarters of the voting members of both Orders have serious doubts that they are doing their job properly.
I also believe that initiates should have the right to choose if they accept the ideas and commands of those people who claim contact with the Secret Chiefs, Third Order, or whatever it is being called this week. Maybe some of us do not want to obey a Third Order that had no hand in the development of Golden Dawn for a hundred years or so. The Golden Dawn (by whatever name) was left on its own for a long time; it is a little late to come in and claim rulership---especially if all we are going to get is a series of bizzare orders and regulations.
I believe that initiates should have the right to choose their own religion, and not be forced to give it up and convert to something else. I am Egyptian Wiccan with Viking tendencies, and maybe a kiss from the Hindu monkey god. Live with it. I am not going to make a good Thelemic, Catholic, Christian, or whatever. Work with my religion---it has ethics and beliefs.
I believe that all members including the Chief should pay their fair share unless they file for a stay of dues. I pay dues that are equal to the rest of the membership.
I believe that initiates deserve a straight answer about the sources of their lessons. I will admit that this is one of those strange areas where I believe that an initiate deserves a straight answer, and outsiders get only general indiciations of where to go. It is part of the benefit of belonging to a group---if you want a straight answer, join an Order.
I believe that the Inner Order officer's rights should probably be limited to issues of curriclum and advancement and the ability to hit the brake if they see their group about to do something really stupid (if it was a train wreck the last time someone tried the idea, it is probably going to be a train wreck this time around also). And note that they are elected and can be removed from office, so they better be doing things for the correct reasons (personal power is not a correct reason to do anything).
I believe that an initiate has the right to know the bylaws of their lodge and Order. And know how changes are made in the rules and regulations. No one should have to put up with an officer that can change the rules or suspend the bylaws with a wave of their hand.
I believe that an initiate should know the reason that their lodge and Order exists. There is a difference between Orders that issue merit badges for time served, and those who are pooling resources for magical purposes. The reason for a lodge's existence affects a lot of things, including what is needed to advance though the Grades.
And finally, I believe that initiates have rights to have human leaders. A leader should be able to come to the members of their group and ask for advice and suggestions. A leader should not have to be all-knowing and all-wise. It cuts down on a lot of BS if you are allowed to be a flawed human being, both as a member and as an officer.
As for these types of ideas making their way into an Initiate's Bill of Rights, I won't hold my breath. I have been told repeatly that my ideas are poppycock---and perhaps they are. But they are mine, and they are what I fight for.
Monday, March 21, 2011
Can the SRIA decide what Golden Dawn group is official?
I have been thinking a lot about "recognition" lately.
First, there is the ongoing drama in the EOGD. When news came out that Robert Zink was voted out of the EOGD, several of us came out and siad a few words. David Griffin (HOGD/A&O) came out in support of the vote. Nick Farrell noted that the EOGD was not set up to allow such a vote; he also stated that a new name and system was probably in order.
Bast Temple took a vote on it, and decided to continue with our current policy of recognition---we recognize individuals, not groups. (There actually some history beyond that policy; it allows us to avoid recognizing the bad eggs in good groups while allowing us to recognize good people in bad groups.) Needless to say, the Bast Temple vote pleased no one outside the pale of Bast Temple. Given the news coming out of the EOGD, I would still vote the same way---recognition to individuals and not groups.
Second, there is always the ongoing debate in Golden Dawn about who is legitimate Golden Dawn and who is not. A lot of that debate depends upon where you think the roots of Golden Dawn lay, and where you think it should be going. Needless to say, those who do not see eye to eye do not recognize one another.
Third and the subject of this post is a recent blog post about William Coon II, the Supreme Magus of the SRICF, saying that the SRICF of America and the SRIA of England have the right to decide which Golden Dawn Order is the "official Golden Dawn." Thumbs up to David Griffin for bringing that one to my attention.
[SRICF: Societas Rosicruciana in Civiatibus Foederatis; SRIA: Societas Rosicruciana in Anglia]
Do I believe that Coon said that? Yes, I do.
Especially if this is the same William Coon II, who is Grand Master of the Grand Encampment of the Knights Templar of the USA. For an example of his authority, consider his opinion about another group that he consider to be an "invasion of terrority" threat.
The Great Priory of America is an unrecognized Templar Order operating within the United States of America, in direct conflict with Section 3 of the Constitution of the Grand Encampment of Knights Templar of the United States of America. Accordingly, membership in the Great Priory of America is incompatible with membership in the Grand Encampment of Knights Templar of the United States of America and any Grand, Subordinate, or Constituent Commandery under its jurisdiction or owing allegiance to the same.
For more about this situation, check out the Freemasons For Dummies blog.
Do I believe that he considers that the Golden Dawn is an "invasion of terrority" threat? Yes, I do.
But does the SRIA and SRCIF have any right to determine what Golden Dawn Order if the "official" Order? In my opinion, no.
I do understand their logic. Kenneth Mackenzie, Samuel Liddell "MacGregor" Mathers, William Wynn Westcott, and William Robert Woodman were all members of the SRIA. Robert Felkin and Arthur Edward Waite were also members. All the founding members of the original Order, the (best candidate, IMHO, for) creator of the Cipher Manuscript, and leaders of two of the splinter groups were members of the SRIA. Logically, especially if you believe that Golden Dawn was started out as a forgery, the lineage of the first generation of Golden Dawn came from the SRIA.
Now, Griffin argued against Koon using the official history of the Golden Dawn as his Order (HOGD/A&O) tells it. Honestly, I do not have enourgh information to decide whether that history is true or not.
But I do have enourgh information to argue that the creator of the Cipher Manuscript (who I believe is Mackenzie) and the three founders of the Isis-Urania (Westcott, Mathers, and Woodman) had no intention of making the Golden Dawn answerable to the SRIA.
First, the Golden Dawn was formed during the mushrooming of the lodge system in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. There were Grand Lodges forming all types of lodges. It was a big business with plenty of potential members (by business, I mean that there is a certain economies involved that are best explained by treating the lodge system as a type of business model---not all lodges were created for profit). Most (if not all) Grand Lodges declared their independence.
Second, the Golden Dawn allowed non-Christians, non-Masons, and women to be members. At the time, these were charter-revoking acts if your group was SRIA---and probably still are (not being a member of the SRIA, I am guessing here).
Third, whether you believe that the Sprengel letters are legitimate or fake, the letters tell us that our roots are in Europe and that the Golden Dawn is on its own---we are not of the SRIA, and the parent body wants nothing to do with us. One of the purposes of the letters, whether they were created by Westcott or actually written by Sprengel herself, is to put the authority for Golden Dawn inside of Golden Dawn itself.
So can the SRCIF and the SRIA issue a judgment and decide who is the "official" Golden Dawn? Yes...(cue laughter)...but it will only be obeyed by the loyal members of the SRIA and SRCIF.
And for me, that is the biggest joke about Koon's opinion about the SRCIF and the SRIA being able to decide the issue. The only people who are going to obey the ruling are (maybe) SRCIF and SRIA members.
Oh, and whatever Golden Dawn group that they decide to pick. Which will be an all-male, all-Freemason, all-Christian group. In fact, I would be willing to bet that it will be the least magical of the Golden Dawn Orders. They will pick something that is little more than a study group with merit badges---not a single member will be able to hex their way out of a wet paper bag.
The leaders of the SRIA and SRCIF will pick the weakest link---a Golden Dawn group that is absolutely no threat to them. It will be all about the business of membership numbers---the membership numbers of the SRIA and SRCIF, not Golden Dawn's.
All the rest of the Golden Dawn community, however much we do not see eye to eye, no matter how much we distrust one another, no matter our beliefs about Golden Dawn history, no matter the differences in our adminstrative structures, will laugh when we hear the official proclaimation and continue to go about our Work. Bottom line is that the SRIA and the SRCIF opinion will be ignored by the overall Golden Dawn community (outside of whoever they pick). Me, David Griffin, Pat Zalewski, Nick Farrell, and Chic Cicero will all agree that the SRIA and the SRCIF have no business determining how official any of our groups are.
I have said this before, and I will say it again---as long as you and your fellow members think that your group is official, who cares about outsiders and their opinions? I don't and either should you.
Remember to keep your dagger sharp, your wand lit, your cup fulled, and your pentacle flowered---we are all in this together.
First, there is the ongoing drama in the EOGD. When news came out that Robert Zink was voted out of the EOGD, several of us came out and siad a few words. David Griffin (HOGD/A&O) came out in support of the vote. Nick Farrell noted that the EOGD was not set up to allow such a vote; he also stated that a new name and system was probably in order.
Bast Temple took a vote on it, and decided to continue with our current policy of recognition---we recognize individuals, not groups. (There actually some history beyond that policy; it allows us to avoid recognizing the bad eggs in good groups while allowing us to recognize good people in bad groups.) Needless to say, the Bast Temple vote pleased no one outside the pale of Bast Temple. Given the news coming out of the EOGD, I would still vote the same way---recognition to individuals and not groups.
Second, there is always the ongoing debate in Golden Dawn about who is legitimate Golden Dawn and who is not. A lot of that debate depends upon where you think the roots of Golden Dawn lay, and where you think it should be going. Needless to say, those who do not see eye to eye do not recognize one another.
Third and the subject of this post is a recent blog post about William Coon II, the Supreme Magus of the SRICF, saying that the SRICF of America and the SRIA of England have the right to decide which Golden Dawn Order is the "official Golden Dawn." Thumbs up to David Griffin for bringing that one to my attention.
[SRICF: Societas Rosicruciana in Civiatibus Foederatis; SRIA: Societas Rosicruciana in Anglia]
Do I believe that Coon said that? Yes, I do.
Especially if this is the same William Coon II, who is Grand Master of the Grand Encampment of the Knights Templar of the USA. For an example of his authority, consider his opinion about another group that he consider to be an "invasion of terrority" threat.
The Great Priory of America is an unrecognized Templar Order operating within the United States of America, in direct conflict with Section 3 of the Constitution of the Grand Encampment of Knights Templar of the United States of America. Accordingly, membership in the Great Priory of America is incompatible with membership in the Grand Encampment of Knights Templar of the United States of America and any Grand, Subordinate, or Constituent Commandery under its jurisdiction or owing allegiance to the same.
For more about this situation, check out the Freemasons For Dummies blog.
Do I believe that he considers that the Golden Dawn is an "invasion of terrority" threat? Yes, I do.
But does the SRIA and SRCIF have any right to determine what Golden Dawn Order if the "official" Order? In my opinion, no.
I do understand their logic. Kenneth Mackenzie, Samuel Liddell "MacGregor" Mathers, William Wynn Westcott, and William Robert Woodman were all members of the SRIA. Robert Felkin and Arthur Edward Waite were also members. All the founding members of the original Order, the (best candidate, IMHO, for) creator of the Cipher Manuscript, and leaders of two of the splinter groups were members of the SRIA. Logically, especially if you believe that Golden Dawn was started out as a forgery, the lineage of the first generation of Golden Dawn came from the SRIA.
Now, Griffin argued against Koon using the official history of the Golden Dawn as his Order (HOGD/A&O) tells it. Honestly, I do not have enourgh information to decide whether that history is true or not.
But I do have enourgh information to argue that the creator of the Cipher Manuscript (who I believe is Mackenzie) and the three founders of the Isis-Urania (Westcott, Mathers, and Woodman) had no intention of making the Golden Dawn answerable to the SRIA.
First, the Golden Dawn was formed during the mushrooming of the lodge system in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. There were Grand Lodges forming all types of lodges. It was a big business with plenty of potential members (by business, I mean that there is a certain economies involved that are best explained by treating the lodge system as a type of business model---not all lodges were created for profit). Most (if not all) Grand Lodges declared their independence.
Second, the Golden Dawn allowed non-Christians, non-Masons, and women to be members. At the time, these were charter-revoking acts if your group was SRIA---and probably still are (not being a member of the SRIA, I am guessing here).
Third, whether you believe that the Sprengel letters are legitimate or fake, the letters tell us that our roots are in Europe and that the Golden Dawn is on its own---we are not of the SRIA, and the parent body wants nothing to do with us. One of the purposes of the letters, whether they were created by Westcott or actually written by Sprengel herself, is to put the authority for Golden Dawn inside of Golden Dawn itself.
So can the SRCIF and the SRIA issue a judgment and decide who is the "official" Golden Dawn? Yes...(cue laughter)...but it will only be obeyed by the loyal members of the SRIA and SRCIF.
And for me, that is the biggest joke about Koon's opinion about the SRCIF and the SRIA being able to decide the issue. The only people who are going to obey the ruling are (maybe) SRCIF and SRIA members.
Oh, and whatever Golden Dawn group that they decide to pick. Which will be an all-male, all-Freemason, all-Christian group. In fact, I would be willing to bet that it will be the least magical of the Golden Dawn Orders. They will pick something that is little more than a study group with merit badges---not a single member will be able to hex their way out of a wet paper bag.
The leaders of the SRIA and SRCIF will pick the weakest link---a Golden Dawn group that is absolutely no threat to them. It will be all about the business of membership numbers---the membership numbers of the SRIA and SRCIF, not Golden Dawn's.
All the rest of the Golden Dawn community, however much we do not see eye to eye, no matter how much we distrust one another, no matter our beliefs about Golden Dawn history, no matter the differences in our adminstrative structures, will laugh when we hear the official proclaimation and continue to go about our Work. Bottom line is that the SRIA and the SRCIF opinion will be ignored by the overall Golden Dawn community (outside of whoever they pick). Me, David Griffin, Pat Zalewski, Nick Farrell, and Chic Cicero will all agree that the SRIA and the SRCIF have no business determining how official any of our groups are.
I have said this before, and I will say it again---as long as you and your fellow members think that your group is official, who cares about outsiders and their opinions? I don't and either should you.
Remember to keep your dagger sharp, your wand lit, your cup fulled, and your pentacle flowered---we are all in this together.
Friday, March 18, 2011
Wednesday, March 16, 2011
QoD Armand Barbault on alchemy
Currently reading Armand Barbault's alchemy book, "Gold of a Thousand Mornings" (1975) ["L'or du Millieme Matin" (1969)]. Started to notice that some of his section headings and "takeaways" could be read as a short alchemy text all on their own. ("Takeaways" for the non-journalist crowd are these sentences you see enclosed in boxes to highlight the important stuff from magazine and newspaper articles.)
The Dawn of the Magicians begins at daybreak on a Spring morning.
The twelve Signs of the Zodiac hold the secret of Nature.
Astrology is only one step from Alchemy, Alchemy only one step from Medicine.
The Adept who reveals all he knows about the First Matter is not betraying any trust, for the means by which it is obtained remain very personal, linked to nature and to the Alchemist's own individual preparation.
A repeated series of operations should bring the Matter to the state of Leaven, the state conductive to the "opening" of gold.
Our preparation is produced by following the philosophic process which deal with the "first part" of the Great Work as described in traditional alchemy.
The Tradition represents the great work as consisting of Three Parts.
[Quoting from The Twelve Keys of Philosophy] The pure is freed from the impure...Corruption of one and generation of the other...All flesh born of the earth shall be destroyed anew and shall be returned to the earth. In as much as previously it was earth, new generation of the salt of the earth is produced by the breadth of celestial life.
[Another quote from The Twelve Keys of Philosophy] A salt is most effectively extracted by fire if the body in question has been previously been brought to putrefaction...the true, natural tartar to be dissolved is hidden in the ash. When this tartar has been dissolved, the mighty lock to the King's apartment may be unfastened.
The Emerald Tablet and the Mutus Liber provide all the essential alchemical knowledge in symbolic form.
All the evidence points to the conclusion that the liquor of gold----which according to all normal systems of physical and chemical analysis contains no gold----constitutes a new state of matter.
In addition to vegetabilised gold, the alchemist can, within the framework of first-degree medicine, prepare tinctures of such metals as silver, antimony, copper and tin.
The three basic Tinctures are those of Gold, Silver and Antimony.
The way of the second order is even more mysterious. The alchemist may embark on it once he possesses First Matter which has reached the first degree of perfection.
The Dawn of the Magicians begins at daybreak on a Spring morning.
The twelve Signs of the Zodiac hold the secret of Nature.
Astrology is only one step from Alchemy, Alchemy only one step from Medicine.
The Adept who reveals all he knows about the First Matter is not betraying any trust, for the means by which it is obtained remain very personal, linked to nature and to the Alchemist's own individual preparation.
A repeated series of operations should bring the Matter to the state of Leaven, the state conductive to the "opening" of gold.
Our preparation is produced by following the philosophic process which deal with the "first part" of the Great Work as described in traditional alchemy.
The Tradition represents the great work as consisting of Three Parts.
[Quoting from The Twelve Keys of Philosophy] The pure is freed from the impure...Corruption of one and generation of the other...All flesh born of the earth shall be destroyed anew and shall be returned to the earth. In as much as previously it was earth, new generation of the salt of the earth is produced by the breadth of celestial life.
[Another quote from The Twelve Keys of Philosophy] A salt is most effectively extracted by fire if the body in question has been previously been brought to putrefaction...the true, natural tartar to be dissolved is hidden in the ash. When this tartar has been dissolved, the mighty lock to the King's apartment may be unfastened.
The Emerald Tablet and the Mutus Liber provide all the essential alchemical knowledge in symbolic form.
All the evidence points to the conclusion that the liquor of gold----which according to all normal systems of physical and chemical analysis contains no gold----constitutes a new state of matter.
In addition to vegetabilised gold, the alchemist can, within the framework of first-degree medicine, prepare tinctures of such metals as silver, antimony, copper and tin.
The three basic Tinctures are those of Gold, Silver and Antimony.
The way of the second order is even more mysterious. The alchemist may embark on it once he possesses First Matter which has reached the first degree of perfection.
Sunday, March 13, 2011
Looking at the Golden Dawn as a Business
One of the things that disturbs some people is that I have the habit of looking at Golden Dawn as if it was a business. I tend to blame this on having managed a business for several years; though to be honest, my father also had something to do with this habit (small family business). But let's be honest, my past experiences just bring to the surface my own infernal triad.
There is something deeply twisted about me that causes me to look at most Order-level decisions and statements and wonder how much of the decisions were actually being driven by business and politics, instead of magic and spirituality. Even when someone says that decision XYZ was made because of ABC magical reason and DEF spiritual reason, I tend to believe that there is a GHI business reason and JKL political reason that is the real cause that XYZ was decided upon.
I may no longer being running a business, but there is a part of me that is permanently corrupted because I have done so. This fact has been pointed out by several people. They also like to point out that I should not even remotely be allowed near the top of any lodge or Order because of my nasty thought processes.
Bottom line, I am not spiritual or magically-inclined enourgh to accurately judge the behavior of those making the BIG decisions in the Golden Dawn tradition. After all, Golden Dawn is not actually a business.
I don't let the opinions of these people stop me from dissecting decisions and statements, poking around the inwards and guts looking for that point that screams that money and political power was its root cause. I am a happy little cynic, ain't I?
But here is an uncomfortable truth---some decisions and statements were driven by business and politics.
I have been thinking about this a lot lately.
For instance, the other day someone asked a former member of the EOGD if they ever asked for a refund. In the back of my mind, I found myself thinking about how issuing refunds is not in the best interests of any Order (my reasoning was primarily business-related). I almost blogged about it (I may still do so in the future).
And yesterday, when reading a post about a rumor that says Robert Zink is going to be paid all the monies from all future EOGD members in exchange for giving up the ownership of the EOGD websites (gee, I wonder whose bright idea it was to have them owned by Zink), I immediately looked at the rumor and thought that it would be a really bad idea to do that. I have since learned that it is just a rumor. Nevertheless, I might still use it as an example the next time I blog about the evil and neccessarity of collecting dues and fees from esoteric members.
In fact, the whole EOGD business/Order model needs to be looked at. We all know that certain decisions were made because they were in the best interest of Robert Zink's wallet. The trick is to figure out which ones they were, and if the EOGD can live without them (or wants to live without them).
One of the problems with business models, and with Order administrative structures, is that human beings tend to treat the first one that we encounter as the only possible model. Your Mother Order and Mother Lodge really warps the way that you view the administrative system.
For instance, look at my view of the traditional hierarchical administrative structure of the Golden Dawn. I tend to look at it with great reservations. Why? Because in the first lodge structure I was exposed to, all the full members had voting rights. And the right to vote was much lower than the typical model. When Bast Temple started, I was one of the people who pushed for Outer Order members to have voting rights; it was what I knew.
(For the record, I have experience with groups that are modeled on the traditional administrative structure of Golden Dawn, and I have never seen anything good come from it in the long run.)
At the moment, the EOGD knows a system that was heavily influenced by Robert Zink, and I think that worries all of us (at least, those of us who are concerned with the health of the overall Golden Dawn tradition). Hopefully, they can figure out the worst decisions and policies that Zink imposed upon the Order and get rid of them.
Remember to keep your wand lit, your cup full, your dagger sharp, and your pentacle flowered---we are all in this together.
There is something deeply twisted about me that causes me to look at most Order-level decisions and statements and wonder how much of the decisions were actually being driven by business and politics, instead of magic and spirituality. Even when someone says that decision XYZ was made because of ABC magical reason and DEF spiritual reason, I tend to believe that there is a GHI business reason and JKL political reason that is the real cause that XYZ was decided upon.
I may no longer being running a business, but there is a part of me that is permanently corrupted because I have done so. This fact has been pointed out by several people. They also like to point out that I should not even remotely be allowed near the top of any lodge or Order because of my nasty thought processes.
Bottom line, I am not spiritual or magically-inclined enourgh to accurately judge the behavior of those making the BIG decisions in the Golden Dawn tradition. After all, Golden Dawn is not actually a business.
I don't let the opinions of these people stop me from dissecting decisions and statements, poking around the inwards and guts looking for that point that screams that money and political power was its root cause. I am a happy little cynic, ain't I?
But here is an uncomfortable truth---some decisions and statements were driven by business and politics.
I have been thinking about this a lot lately.
For instance, the other day someone asked a former member of the EOGD if they ever asked for a refund. In the back of my mind, I found myself thinking about how issuing refunds is not in the best interests of any Order (my reasoning was primarily business-related). I almost blogged about it (I may still do so in the future).
And yesterday, when reading a post about a rumor that says Robert Zink is going to be paid all the monies from all future EOGD members in exchange for giving up the ownership of the EOGD websites (gee, I wonder whose bright idea it was to have them owned by Zink), I immediately looked at the rumor and thought that it would be a really bad idea to do that. I have since learned that it is just a rumor. Nevertheless, I might still use it as an example the next time I blog about the evil and neccessarity of collecting dues and fees from esoteric members.
In fact, the whole EOGD business/Order model needs to be looked at. We all know that certain decisions were made because they were in the best interest of Robert Zink's wallet. The trick is to figure out which ones they were, and if the EOGD can live without them (or wants to live without them).
One of the problems with business models, and with Order administrative structures, is that human beings tend to treat the first one that we encounter as the only possible model. Your Mother Order and Mother Lodge really warps the way that you view the administrative system.
For instance, look at my view of the traditional hierarchical administrative structure of the Golden Dawn. I tend to look at it with great reservations. Why? Because in the first lodge structure I was exposed to, all the full members had voting rights. And the right to vote was much lower than the typical model. When Bast Temple started, I was one of the people who pushed for Outer Order members to have voting rights; it was what I knew.
(For the record, I have experience with groups that are modeled on the traditional administrative structure of Golden Dawn, and I have never seen anything good come from it in the long run.)
At the moment, the EOGD knows a system that was heavily influenced by Robert Zink, and I think that worries all of us (at least, those of us who are concerned with the health of the overall Golden Dawn tradition). Hopefully, they can figure out the worst decisions and policies that Zink imposed upon the Order and get rid of them.
Remember to keep your wand lit, your cup full, your dagger sharp, and your pentacle flowered---we are all in this together.
Saturday, March 12, 2011
QoD Raymond Abellio makes a wish
It is high time that activities such as astrology and alchemy, which are wrongly termed 'occult', provoked some reaction other than the customary blind acceptance or sarcasm. I feel it is necessary to point out to those deep thinkers who have shed all their illusions without having gained anything else in the process, that to denounce the charlatanism of certain 'seers ' or the naive attitude of 'believers' is not a sufficient investigation of these secular disciplines. One wishes that orthodox scholars would bring to bear judgements based on practical knowledge and would at the very least agree to learn the rules of the game. Instead , they oppose on principle arts of which they have no knowledge and about which they fabricate quite fantastic ideas.
---Raymond Abellio
---Raymond Abellio
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
